The CIA Directorate of Intelligence identifies Liberation Theology as a “contemporary Catholic religious doctrine espoused in the Third World,” with Marxist roots, which is “openly anti-west and identifies the United States as responsible for the exploitation of the Third World.” 1 The document also perceives the threat of Liberation Theology as a target for communist (namely Soviet and Cuban) exploitation, and a catalyst to a dangerous collaboration of certain churches with Marxist revolutionaries, giving legitimacy to guerilla movements, impeding US efforts to contain them. 2 Although the article focuses on Latin American and Pacific examples, it is still relevant to Zaire and identifies Zaire as a place where the Church provides educational and medical services not offered by the government. 3 This report is consistent with the 1973 National Intelligence Survey, which emphasizes the central role of the Church in providing these services where the state falls short. The report identifies churches that assume the role of the government by providing social services as an indicator of Liberation Theology.
If the United States saw the Catholic church in Zaire as a source of Liberation Theology, their evangelizing efforts had an added dimension; not only were they trying to spread Christianity as a defense against communism, they also found protestant Christianity to be an alternative to dangerous anti-western ideas that might come from Catholic churches in Zaire. Whereas Catholicism posed the threat of Liberation Theology and the guerrilla revolts that may come with it, the Protestant churches aligned with Mobutu’s project of cultural nationalism, therefore reinforcing the legitimacy of his US-backed regime.
By observing the US’ outlook on the developments in Protestantism from the perspective of fundamentalist missionaries, who saw the consolidation of Protestant denominations into one common administration as a dangerous theological error which would give liberals too much power, it is easy to get an oversimplified understanding of US religious objectives in Congo. A more accurate view is achieved when considering a disconnect between the ideological arguments of the fundamentalists and the interests of the US government, most importantly in preventing communism and Liberation Theology from taking root in Congo so as to protect their economic interests. Philpot, who cooperated with Makanzu’s African and nationalist requirements for his evangelizing crusade in 1978, is an example of prioritizing the spread of Protestant Christianity as a deterrent to Communism over theological disputes. This interaction demonstrates the ways in which the ECZ’s strong emphasis on cultural nationalism as a way of regaining Congolese identity was an instrumental part of Mobutu’s authenticité campaign, as well as an instrumental factor in protecting US economic interests in the Congo.
